Home
PLATFORM Discrepancy Report Engine Attorney-Editable Chronology Grounded Q&A System Live Testimony Analysis Legal Knowledge Base Entity & Relationship Mapping
APPLICATIONS Litigation Litigation Funding
COMPANY Team Log in
Request a demo

Attorney-Editable Chronology

The chronology of the matter, built from the full record and kept current.

Overview

The chronology frames the pleadings, the witness statements, the expert instructions and the skeleton argument. The Attorney-Editable Chronology builds it from the whole record, places each event on the date it occurred with the documents that evidence it, and identifies where the parties’ documents put the same event on different dates.

It is kept current as disclosure arrives, so the team works from one chronology that reflects the record as it stands, and narrows it by issue or by party when a focused chronology is needed.

Where it is used

Pleadings

The factual narrative of the claim or defence, with the documents for each allegation identified.

Limitation and notice

The dates on which limitation, notice and contractual time bars turn, with any dispute over them identified early.

Witness statements

A witness’s account checked against the documented sequence of events before the statement is finalised.

Skeleton arguments

A chronology for the court, narrowed to the issues before it.

In practice

The chronology of the matter shown, in date order.

The chronology

14 SEP 2020Prime contractexecuted3 NOV 2020Facade subcontractawarded to Atlas8 DEC 2020Specification 07 4213 issued forconstruction22 JAN 2021Value engineeringitem VE-17 opened9 FEB 2021VE-17 approved,$1.48M savingclaimed11 days11 FEB 2021Panel fabricationbegins22 FEB 2021Fabrication releasedfor the full facade12 MAR 2021Atlas certifies NFPA285 compliance atsubmittal19 MAR 2021Architect stampssubmittal, noexceptions taken14 MAY 2021Atlas purchasespolyethylene-corepanel138 days17 JUN 2021Revised data sheetemailed to theArchitect4 AUG 2021Corvalis NFPA 285report issued,mineral core only91 DAYS43 days3 NOV 2021FISP inspectionrecorded ascompleted28 NOV 2021Daily report showsscaffold still onnorth elevation61 days15 DEC 2021Substantialcompletion certified12 JAN 2022FISP Cycle 9 reportfiled, facadeclassified SAFE2 YEARS 2 MONTHS27 minutes18 MAR 2024Facade fire spreadsfrom floor 31 tofloor 3429 MAR 2024DOB violation issuedfor the exteriorwall166 DAYS11 SEP 2024Owner serves noticeof claim on Kelmar1 YEAR 4 MONTHS22 JAN 2026Complaint filed inthe CommercialDivision18 MAR 2026Kelmar answers,relying on a fireconsultant sign-off5 days15 APR 2026Cross-claims filedagainst Atlas
14 SEP 2020ONE SOURCEPrime contract executed3 NOV 2020ONE SOURCEFacade subcontract awarded to Atlas8 DEC 2020ONE SOURCESpecification 07 42 13 issued for construction22 JAN 2021ONE SOURCEValue engineering item VE-17 opened9 FEB 2021TWO SOURCESVE-17 approved, $1.48M saving claimed

The first five entries of 22.

Scroll to view the full chronology.

Where the parties’ documents disagree, the entry sets out both accounts.

One entry, opened

Substantial completionDisputed · 61 days apart

High · Date conflict · Prime Contract cl. 1.3

15 Dec 2021 · the Architect
“The date of Substantial Completion of the entire Work is hereby established as 15 December 2021…”

against

14 Feb 2022 · the Owner
“Our client does not accept that Substantial Completion was achieved on 15 December 2021… Substantial Completion was achieved on 14 February 2022…”

The Architect’s certificate and the Owner’s notice of claim place substantial completion 61 days apart.

A disputed date appears wherever it matters: in the chronology, as a finding in the discrepancy report, and on the entity map between the parties who dispute it.

One record, three views

Certificate of Substantial Completion

the Architect · asserts 15 Dec 2021

Notice of Claim

the Owner · asserts 14 Feb 2022

Shown in

ChronologyThe entry of 15 December 2021, marked disputed, holding both dates.
Discrepancy reportThe corresponding finding, ranked high, measured against Prime Contract cl. 1.3.
Entity mapThe Architect and the Owner, connected by the certificate.

How it works

Events are dated by what the documents say happened, not by when the documents were written, and an event described in several documents appears once, with each of them behind it. A date the record does not give is not supplied. Counsel confirms, amends or rejects entries, and those decisions are kept as the chronology grows.

Grounded Q&A System →